Compliance is not a documentyou file and forget.

What you actually get

• Privacy policy, terms, cookie policy and data processing terms — written properly, not templated.
• Updated when the law changes, without you having to notice that it did.
• GDPR handled at the architecture level: what is stored, for how long, and how it is erased on request.
• AI Act transparency built in — your customers are told they are talking to an AI, because they must be.
• Cookie consent that actually gates what it claims to gate, rather than a banner over nothing.

Most compliance on small sites is decorative

A banner that sets the tracking cookie before you click it. A privacy policy naming a company that no longer processes the data. Terms copied from someone else's site, still carrying their jurisdiction. It looks compliant, which is worse than looking non-compliant, because nobody investigates until something goes wrong. We do the unglamorous version: the consent gate actually gates, and the documents describe what the system genuinely does.

Handled in the architecture, not just on paper

Real compliance is a property of how the thing is built. Personal data your employee remembers is held separately from the general patterns they learn, so an erasure request can be honoured completely without lobotomising them. Retention has limits enforced in code. Your customers' data is yours, and the chain of who processes what is documented because a regulator can ask.

The obligations are still arriving

AI transparency duties phase in through 2026, and more is coming. For most businesses that means a scramble each time, or discovering the requirement from a customer complaint. For ours it means nothing — the change lands in the platform and your site is already correct. That is what continuous actually buys you.